Table of contents
- Author warning
- About the Developer
- Prologue
- Chapter 1. What is the problem?
- Chapter 2. History of the dominance of allopathic medicine
- Chapter 3. Oncology - a thriving business
- Chapter 4. Theory of Cancer
- Chapter 5. Who is sick and why?
- Chapter 6. A new concept for the treatment and prevention of disease
- Chapter 7. "Cut, etch, burn" - traditional oncological methods
- Chapter 8. The main causes of the onset and development of cancer
- 1. Nutritional factor
- 2. Toxic factor
- 3. Psychological factor
- 4. Physical factor
- Chapter 9. The choice of the concept of cancer treatment. The determining factor in the success of treatment
- Chapter 10. An integrated approach to cancer treatment
- Chapter 11. Questions and answers that can save a patient's life
- Appendix:
- 1. A list of non-traditional cancer treatment clinics and the methods they use
- 2. List of used literature and other sources of information
← Previous. Chapter 8 | Next. Chapter 10 →
Chapter 9 - Choosing the concept of cancer treatment. The determining factor in the success of treatment
It is impossible to solve the problem in the same way
thinking, which led to this problem.
A. Einstein
Modern oncology has driven itself into a corner because of the fact that for decades it has supported the erroneous conception of the nature of cancer and its treatment. Today, to create the appearance of progress, it has to resort to outright falsification of facts, to propagate myths and to maintain among the population the fear of insidiousness and hard to cure cancer. An important aspect of traditional oncology is also the creation and maintenance of opinion among the population that there are no alternatives to its cruel and ineffective methods. However, anyone who pays a little time to understand the situation, it is easy to understand that with this approach and with this way of thinking, the problem of cancer simply can not be solved. This will require a paradigm shift in oncology, which is difficult to imagine with its full monopoly in the treatment of cancer and the lack of motivation to change the existing order of things in this area.
That is why, when I talk with cancer patients, I start talking about the treatment of cancer with an explanation of the political and economic reasons that led to such a deplorable situation in its traditional treatment. The same reasons explain that besides the traditional three - "burn, etch and burn" - oncology nothing else can offer. If I do not explain this to the patient at the very beginning of the conversation, then after a long story about other, much more successful methods of treatment, bringing many scientific arguments in their favor, indicating the examples of patients who have overcome this disease, my interlocutor will ask: "Well, if these methods are so successful, why are not they practiced by doctors? Why do not we hear about it? ". In this case, the patient will significantly "cover the door" of his perception of much more successful alternatives and will not give them proper value. You can, of course, begin to explain the factors that play a role in this situation after the question has been raised, but experience shows that there is not much that can pass in the "closed door".
For many it seems difficult to understand that successful methods (with a probability of success over 80%) can be hidden from the overwhelming majority of the population. It should be borne in mind that, without statistical falsification, without taking into account precancerous conditions as cancers, without taking into account incorrectly diagnosed cases of cancer, the success of the traditional triple (chemotherapy, surgery and radiotherapy) will not exceed 5%.[1]
[1] Less than 2% of the total number of cancers of rare cancers, such as testicular cancer, Hodgkin's lymphoma and some others, are successful up to 80%. In this case, some scientists explain such a high success is not a cure, but a high probability of self-healing of an organism from such types of cancer.
I will give just a few examples of the most famous protocols and drugs offered by well-known doctors and scientists, some of whom are Nobel laureates and whose methods have been successfully applied to patients in treating thousands of people, both by the authors themselves and their followers:
- Linus Pauling - hyperdoses of vitamin C;
- Joanna Budwig - diet Budwig;
- Raymond Ralph - electro-medicine;
- Bob Beck - electro-medicine;
- Max Gerson - Gerson's protocol;
- William Coley - toxins of Koli;
- Renee Casey - isiak tea;
- Tulio Simoncini - treatment with sodium bicarbonate;
Preparations:
- laetril (B17), cesium chloride, hydrazine sulfate.
To date, it is known about 400 methods, protocols and drugs that are successfully used in alternative cancer treatment.
Despite the fact that many know or suspect that financial interest today plays a big role in medicine, few people understand how deeply this interest penetrates into all its spheres and how cruel the consequences of this can be. Therefore, for myself, I have long ago determined that the main factor in the successful cure of a patient is his ability to understand the situation and take full control over his health. What is actually easier said than done.
It's hard for a simple person to understand that millions of people die of cancer every year just because the medicine that most people trust is really cruel business, whose goal is to obtain a guaranteed profit from patients and their diseases. Only by making such a personal paradigm shift patient can defeat cancer with a very high probability, at whatever stage it was. Thus, the outcome of the disease is decided not at the time of its diagnosis, and not in the process of its treatment by traditional methods, but when the patient receives information about the real state of affairs and about the alternative path that he can choose. Unfortunately, not everyone can do this choice. The paralyzing fear and pressure of the doctor, aimed at the fastest start of treatment, significantly complicate this choice, if, of course, the patient in general has an idea of this choice.
Prior to the description of the main principles of alternative cancer treatment, I would like to dwell on some details and facts related to this disease, which in turn will help the patient to build the right attitude to her and choose the most appropriate treatment strategy.
Modern medicine to the human body today refers to a primitive machine, all of whose reactions (temperature rise, pain, etc.) should be monitored or eliminated. Many of the functions of this imperfect machine must be strengthened (for example, by vaccination). Natural phenomena, for example, childbirth, must take place in the unnatural setting of the hospital under the supervision of doctors, as if nature had not previously coped with this task.
In fact, our body is so highly developed, self-regulating and self-sufficient system that the level of modern science with its material and reductionistic approach can be equated with a Neanderthal looking at the stars and trying to understand the structure of the universe. All external manifestations of the work of our body (and thanks to modern diagnostics - and many internal manifestations of his work that can not be evaluated without special instruments) should be perceived as normal, compensatory, self-regulating, and not pathological. Many diseases should be considered as manifestations of these normal processes. So, it is already proved that many childhood infections are necessary for the child's immune system to strengthen it and move to a new level. Moreover, this transition affects not only the immune system of the child and the physical aspect of his health. The scientists noted a sharp improvement in the mental and creative abilities of children after the transfer of their usual childhood diseases.
When a patient is diagnosed with cancer, this should not be seen as a verdict or a blow to fate. This is the same compensatory reaction of the body, not recognized by the doctors as such and therefore aggressively suppressed. Hence, such lamentable results of cancer treatment and such a high percentage of relapses or worsening of the course of the disease. What I'm about to say may at first seem very difficult to perceive. It is necessary to radically change its attitude to this disease from negative and depressive to positive. I mean by this the following. Many patients who have had to change their life and attitude to it after the diagnosis, refer to that period as a difficult, but positive. It was a turning point in their life, which they changed dramatically, began to lead a much healthier and more intelligent lifestyle, reassessed many values and concepts, and now feel much better both physically and spiritually. Yes, it is possible - so treat the most terrible diagnosis for today. It is necessary to perceive this situation as follows: your body gives you a signal that it is difficult for you to cope with the way of your life, and your help is needed. The body is overloaded with toxins, it lacks nutrients, it works in a regime of prolonged stress, and all this against a background of very limited activity. This signal should be taken as a warning call from a friend about a danger that you are unlikely to ignore.
So, right after the diagnosis you need to say goodbye to your old life and boldly enter into a new life, in which more health, more happiness awaits you, and you will discover many amazing things that were not available to you in your old life. Researchers have already proved the positive psychosomatic influence of both a healthy diet and a healthy lifestyle in general, when not only a person feels better and has more energy, but also his spiritual thoughts are purer, thoughts are clearer, actions are nobler, interests are higher, behavior more tolerant of others. In turn, an unhealthy lifestyle, congestion with toxins, stresses give a negative perception of life, depression, anger. Extremely toxic chemotherapy further suppresses the patient, drives him into an even deeper depression, deprives him of his will.
Therefore, it is very important that after diagnosis, fear does not restrain the will and does not eliminate the ability of objective thinking and analysis. Many doctors, unfortunately, use the patient's fear to begin prompt treatment, which, most often, significantly cuts the patient's chances of recovery. In most cases of asymptomatic cancers (those who were diagnosed with regular examinations, for example, mammography and PSA tests, and did not show any symptomatology), there is no need to hurry or panic at all. To establish, as for a long time this neoplasm has appeared, it is very complex or difficult. Your body could cope with it for years and, possibly, it was found at the stage of regression. A biopsy that breaks the integrity of the tumor and increases the likelihood of metastasis, to the question of how long the tumor has appeared and how your body copes with it, you too will not respond. If you have found an asymptomatic tumor, you will just have to analyze your life and determine what points in it you need to change in order to reduce exposure to toxins, change the image of nutrition, increase physical activity, reduce stress. Correctly selected dietary supplements are also necessary to compensate for the chronic insufficiency of certain nutrient components, which are almost always observed in everyone who has a healthy but unhealthy diet for a healthy one. Tumor monitoring should be carried out regularly, but not by invasive, and as less as possible by harmful methods, since multiple biopsies, frequent mammograms and CT scans are themselves carcinogenic.
Summarizing the above, a very important first step towards recovery is overcoming fear and preserving the ability to objectively assess the situation. The diagnosis should be used as an occasion to radically change one's life and pay much more attention to their health in it.
Continue the conversation about the correct attitude to getting a diagnosis and a correct understanding of the cancerous process will help the pathologists. These specialists noticed that many common types of cancer, such as prostate cancer and thyroid cancer, are found at autopsy of patients who died from other causes, 30-40 times more often than they are diagnosed by doctors. The mortality rate among diagnosed and treated cases of cancer is much higher than the difference between diagnosed and undiagnosed cases. This indicates to us the main factor that significantly increases mortality - aggressive treatment. Also pathologists more than 50% of those who died from non-cancer diagnoses find tumors of various localizations that did not disturb people in their lifetime. Such "sleeping" tumors can exist in the body for decades and do not cause any harm. Also tumors appear and disappear in the process of life. Some factor, for example, a strong stress or an organism overloading with toxins, caused the appearance of a tumor. Elimination of such a factor or mobilization of body forces causes regress of education. Such processes can occur throughout the life of a person. Andreas Moritz in his book "Cancer is not a disease" writes: "Now, at this moment, millions of people live their own lives, having different cancers and even without any idea about it. Also, millions of people will recover from these cancers without even knowing it. "
Interestingly, many cases of rapid recovery from cancer after infections such as chicken pox, pneumonia, fever of various etiologies are described. Under these conditions, all the body's defenses, the stimulation of immunity by a certain pathogen, the elimination of toxins through profuse sweating at a fever and the immediate destruction of tumor cells by a high temperature, which they tolerate worse than healthy cells, take place.[2] Thus, these states can be a critical reaction of the body to a tumor or "God's gift", which helps the patient thus recover from cancer. Unfortunately, many patients die because they are not allowed to go through all stages of the disease, suppressing its symptoms, while these diseases are an attempt by the body to find a way out of toxins accumulated in the body. Medical treatment should be aimed at maintaining the body's immune system and facilitating the withdrawal of toxins, rather than stopping these processes with symptomatic treatment and much less suppressing the immune system with traditional methods of cancer treatment.
[2] What is one of the alternative methods of treating cancer - thermotherapy, widely practiced in clinics in Germany and Austria.
During the whole time that I am studying alternatives to cancer treatment, I constantly come across that many leading experts in this field believe that for the treatment of asymptomatic cancer tumors, as for most types of cancer 1-2 stage with different symptomatic, a fairly radical change in diet and lifestyle. It is not uncommon for cases when this approach also helps in more advanced stages of the disease. For today, I am absolutely convinced that if the disease does not develop dramatically quickly, its course can be slowed down, stopped and reversed only by changing its diet, reducing the level of stress, increasing physical activity and eliminating toxins from the body and from everyday life.
However, it is easier said than done. Most people do not know what changes they need to give the body the best chance to cope with the disease. And this is a pretty serious problem. Another problem is that for today there are very few specialists who could draw up a detailed protocol of actions: diet, detoxification of the body and life, level of activity, actions aimed at controlling stress, individual selection of dietary supplements. These same specialists should observe the patients for weeks and months, and sometimes even years, helping them to implement all these changes in their lives, controlling and adjusting individual protocols of treatment. Such specialists can be people who came from science, medicine, naturopathy and simply researchers of natural alternative methods of oncology or personally surviving cancer who are well versed in this topic and use a comprehensive approach to treatment. It should be noted that some clinics of alternative oncology, although they base treatment on one or several methods, but do so against the background of the same comprehensive comprehensive approach (such as the Gerson Clinic in Mexico, the sanatorium of Mark Sirkus in Brazil).
The problem is further aggravated by the fact that most patients who seek alternative methods of treatment have a reductionist approach and are looking for a single "magic remedy" for cancer treatment, not realizing that only a complex treatment combining all of the above aspects will give a real chance for cure.
But this is not the last problem facing the patient. Many specialists who offer alternative cancer treatment are either afraid to contradict traditional oncology and offer their treatment as an addition to it, or, again, apply a reductionist approach and treat a remedy that acts on one particular aspect of the disease. In this regard, the positive effect of this approach will be severely limited.
Communication with many patients and their relatives pushed me to the idea that the main problem of an alternative approach to cancer treatment today lies in the fact that the vast majority of people who turn to the alternative, consider it either an addition, or the latest treatment option. This approach does not disclose 95% of the potential that a patient can receive with an unambiguous choice of treatment in favor of a natural alternative approach. That is why I pay so much attention to the non-medical side of the issue and explain to the patient the reasons why this approach has not received the necessary recognition from the medical establishment.
To facilitate the understanding of the problem that the alternative approach does not take yet a deserved place in the treatment of cancer, I identified four categories of patients and their relationship to this approach.
1 category - patients who do not have information about natural alternative methods of cancer treatment. The same group includes patients who have a negative attitude towards them because of the discrediting of these methods of honey. the establishment and means of the media, and as a result of a complete silence about their benefits and successes. The forecast is very unfavorable. If the diagnosis is correct, and not a precancerous condition (such as in-situ carcinoma in situ) or an erroneous diagnosis, as is often the case with an increased PSA reading, the probability of healing is 2-5%.[3]
[3] German professor of statistical biology Ulrich Abel, 1989; Australian metasearch for the effectiveness of chemotherapy 2004
2 category - Patients who use one or more alternative methods in addition to the main traditional treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy). As a rule, under such conditions, alternatives can soften the course of the disease, accelerate the recovery period after chemotherapy, sometimes improve its effectiveness or reduce side effects. As a result, each subsequent course of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, each subsequent operation continues its destructive effect on the body, which alternative means can no longer compensate. At best, with this approach it is possible to prolong the patient's life for some time.
3 category - patients who turn to alternative methods after an ineffective passage of a full course of cancer treatment in medical institutions. Such patients, as a rule, completely switch to alternative methods of treatment. The success of the treatment of such patients depends on the amount and correctness of the information, as well as on the time that the disease leaves them. If the patient does not begin treatment based on an integrated approach, his treatment can be a lottery in which he will try as many methods and drugs as he can, hoping to find the method that will help. But even in this case, his chances will be better than at the beginning of treatment by the traditional "troika" of oncology. If the patient is treated complexly, as a rule, with a specialist or in an "alternative clinic," even after serious damage to his health by "cutting, burning and etching" methods, his chances can be estimated at 30-40%.[4]
[4] Nicholas Gonzales - Gonzalez Clinic, Webster Ker - Foundation for Independent Cancer Research.
4 category - patients who immediately after the diagnosis decided to use only alternative ways of treating cancer. According to statistics and according to many experts, on average the success of curing such patients is equal to 80-95% regardless of the stage of the disease.
Such a significant difference between the third and fourth categories of patients is due to the fact that traditional methods of "cutting, burning and etching" destroy the body's immune, digestive and detoxification systems, while creating conditions for more aggressive cancer growth, metastasis, secondary cancers. Many chronic pathological conditions caused by these methods also reduce the chances that the body will be able to recover even with proper treatment.
The importance of patient awareness of an alternative approach to cancer treatment and the right choice between traditional and alternative treatment plays the most important role in the success of cancer treatment, as shown in the above classification of patients' attitudes to the alternative. That is why, in my opinion, it is so important to help the patient make this choice before simply offering one of the alternative methods of treatment. Such a change of concepts is a complex process and, unfortunately, not everyone can.
It will take years and possibly decades, until a paradigm shift occurs in honey. establishment and today's methods of treatment of oncology will be recognized as a medical error. For now, millions of people die every year from practically useless, harmful and cruel treatments for reasons far from medicine.
Boris Grinblat
← Previous. Chapter 8 | Next. Chapter 10 →
Download the e-book for free
Download the book for free in DOC format
in English in English German in French in italian in Polish
Download the book for free in PDF format
in English in English German in French in italian in Polish