Table of contents
- Author warning
- About the Developer
- Prologue
- Chapter 1. What is the problem?
- Chapter 2. History of the dominance of allopathic medicine
- Chapter 3. Oncology - a thriving business
- Chapter 4. Theory of Cancer
- Chapter 5. Who is sick and why?
- Chapter 6. A new concept for the treatment and prevention of disease
- Chapter 7. "Cut, etch, burn" - traditional oncological methods
- Chapter 8. The main causes of the onset and development of cancer
- 1. Nutritional factor
- 2. Toxic factor
- 3. Psychological factor
- 4. Physical factor
- Chapter 9. The choice of the concept of cancer treatment. The determining factor in the success of treatment
- Chapter 10. An integrated approach to cancer treatment
- Chapter 11. Questions and answers that can save a patient's life
- Appendix:
- 1. A list of non-traditional cancer treatment clinics and the methods they use
- 2. List of used literature and other sources of information
← Previous. Chapter 2 | Next. Chapter 4 →
Chapter 3 - Oncology - a thriving business
The art of medicine is to impress the patient with treatment, until nature itself cures it.
Вольтер
Do you know that there are more people working in the oncology industry than are being treated for oncology? The annual turnover of this industry is hundreds of billions of dollars. And now think: if there is, or rather will be recognized, at least one of dozens of existing drugs or protocols that will solve the cancer problem, what will happen with oncology clinics, diagnostic centers, doctors, technical and administrative personnel, as well as manufacturers of expensive diagnostic equipment that are involved in this industry?
Did you know that for one cancer patient, US insurance companies pay an average of $ 350,000, and for natural treatment they do not pay a dollar? The course of treatment for a foreign patient in the US, Israel, England and other Western countries costs from $ 250,000 to $ 1 million! The cost of the same drugs or combination of drugs included in the course of treatment is from $ 3,000 to $ 20,000 per month. The profits that pharmaceutical companies receive from selling a single chemotherapeutic drug can reach 500,000%! Such profits can not be justified by the high costs of researching and obtaining a patent, as the profits of these companies grow every year and amount to tens of billions of dollars, and the main part of their expenses is the advertising of their medicines, as well as lobbying for the interests of these companies.
For comparison, Gerson's protocol, which has 90% success in cancer treatment, costs only a few hundred dollars a month and only $ 25,000 for a short course of treatment at a clinic in Tijuana, Mexico. The Bill Henderson protocol costs only $ 5 per day, and Dr. Sirkus's protocol is even cheaper. Some home treatment methods can cost only $ 50 per month.
It is naive to assume that the official oncology, Big Pharma and the politicians bought by it will sincerely try to heal cancer. Organizations such as the American Cancer Association[1], the British analogue of "Cancer Research UK"[2] and similar large charitable organizations for fighting cancer, receive billions of dollars of subsidies a year. At the same time, not a dollar is spent on researching natural and much more successful alternatives, whereas all the funds (after paying huge salaries to the management of these organizations) are going to research dead-end directions, such as chemotherapy. Very often the leaders of these "charitable" organizations come to senior positions from Big Pharma. Also, managers of these funds after several years of work often receive leadership positions in the same pharmaceutical companies. Therefore, it would be naive to expect from these supposedly independent organizations that they will work towards the cessation of their activities. That is why one of the main activities of these organizations, as well as the medical establishment itself, is the fight against much more successful alternative methods of cancer treatment, as well as misinformation of the population about the real causes of cancer development and its prevention. They also controlled Wikipedia, which is carried out with the help of the army of paid shadow authors. They create websites like QuackWatch[3], where all natural methods, their authors and specialists who apply them, are subjected to crude pseudoscientific criticism and discredit. The numerous army of Internet provocateurs (so-called "trolls"), paid for by the medical establishment and similar "charitable" organizations, actively participate in discussions on the topic of oncology, vaccination, benefits or harms of one or another type of treatment or drug. People interested in these topics go to these resources for information, but often remain confused by the categorical statements of these "virtual pen workers". I often communicate with them both in English and Russian sites. And I was always amazed by the similarity of the ridiculously coarse manner of communication of each of the "trolls" and their apparently learned arguments and attacks.
[1] American Cancer Association.
[2] Cancer Research UK.
[3] "Observer for charlatans."
Despite the fact that since the announcement by President Nixon of the war on cancer in 1971, the US is spending more on oncology than any other country, the incidence rate is steadily growing, the cancer is younger, and mortality rates have not declined for 40 years .
According to modern forecasts, since the present time, in America during the course of his life, every second man and every third woman will get cancer. Other developed countries are also approaching similar statistics. In Russia, the incidence rate of cancer is constantly increasing (now every fifth or sixth person is ill), and if the state of affairs to solve the problem in this sphere does not change radically, Russia will soon catch up with this unenviable indicator. Over the years of the "war" with cancer, a clear trend emerged: the more money is invested in oncology, the more cancer patients appear, and the more sick - the greater the profits of Big Pharma, more advertising, political influence, leading to even greater investment.
There are many more examples in traditional oncology where the interests of big business profits prevail over common sense and people's interests. I will give only a couple of such examples.
Mammography, which is recommended to do to women after 40 years annually, is itself carcinogenic. There are studies that prove that with every mammogram the risk of cancer increases by 1-2% annually. In addition, this method is quite expensive and rather inaccurate. It is believed that erroneous diagnoses are put up to 40% of cases. At the same time, there is a thermography that has the accuracy of 98% diagnostics, costs 4-5 cheaper and is an absolutely harmless procedure. Nevertheless, honey. the establishment does not introduce its wide application, and it can be found only in selected small centers and clinics.
Another example is a test for a breast cancer gene that costs from $ 3,000. Despite the fact that the presence of mutations in the BRAC1 and BRAC2 gene is absolutely inadequate for the onset of the disease, and that the most important factor in controlling this gene is nutrition and other external factors, this test has nevertheless become wider and more widely used, and probably , will soon be recommended to all women.
If honey. the establishment was interested in the prevention of breast cancer, it would be much easier and cheaper to explain to women who have bad heredity, that they just need to change their lifestyle and nutrition, reduce stress levels, remove as much carcinogens from their lives as possible, and regularly cleanse the body from toxins. I am convinced that knowing this, far fewer women would go to a crippling preventive double mastectomy (a surgical operation to remove the breast), which official oncology is trying to popularize as a method of preventing breast cancer. What will they offer us next? Cut one lung, one kidney and, thereby, reduce the likelihood of cancer of these organs by half? After the provocative statement by Angelina Jolie that she had removed both breasts for her cancer prevention, many women began to follow her example. In England, there were already cases when men followed her example and removed her prostate to prevent her cancer.
There are several scientific studies in which the role of genes in cancers does not exceed 2-5%, and the rest are factors that include these genes. This is the new science of epigenetics, which proves that our genes are regulated by factors of the external environment through our perception. The main role in this is played by the cell membrane, which is responsible for what factors can change the expression of genes.
Is it not more reasonable to work on eliminating 95-98% factors than to make an expensive test for a gene whose probability of mutation is statistically not so great, and the effect of such a mutation can be eliminated by fairly simple lifestyle changes? On the other hand, a positive result of this test can bring to preventive double mastectomy (a very expensive and crippling operation)!
I hope that in these aforementioned facts and arguments, many readers will be able to find the answer to the question: "If there really are effective methods of treating cancer, then why do they not yet apply? After all, if such methods or preparations existed, we would probably have immediately learned about them from the media, and doctors would immediately apply them? ". Summarize this answer in the following way: oncology is the largest business that fights hard for its monopoly, establishing full control over methods of treatment and diagnosis of cancer, as well as with the help of purchased politicians and infiltrated by its employees regulatory agencies. Mass media is an effective tool that controls information on this topic.
Another common question:
"Where are the people who are cured by natural methods? Why do not you hear anything about them from them? "
I want to answer this question with a small example. Recently I saw on the Internet on "Classmates" an appeal from volunteers for help for a girl with cancer in 4 stage. She needed to collect $ 400,000 (!!!) for treatment in Israel. Many wished her well and made donations to the bank account. But there were also at least 10-12 people for one or two days, who wanted to help the girl who gave examples of her cancer healing. The majority had cancer 4-th stage, and doctors have already abandoned them. Someone was cured of hunger and urinotherapy, someone with juices and diet, someone cleansing the body, vitamins and supplements, someone praying. All these methods are natural. Let some of them are very narrow (in terms of modern natural alternative oncology), and some are quite radical, but they helped people! It would be logical for the volunteers to ask these cured people about the details and reduce them to their own girls. But it turned out the opposite - the volunteers roughly forbade these cancer-winning people to leave their messages on that page, arguing that the girl needs money for treatment, and not "idiotic" advice.
The conclusion is that many of us just do not want to notice people who have been healed themselves using such means. Most expect to hear a recovery story using traditional, rather than alternative, cancer treatments. in the opposite case, their faith in official medicine collapses. But in fact, of 10 patients, who have won cancer in the 4 stage, all 10 will be those who have been treated by natural methods. Only in 1-3-th degree of cancer can be found a small number of people who were cured, using the methods of traditional oncology (surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy). And as the well-known German physiologist Joana Budwig said: "We do not know if these people were cured due to chemotherapy and radiotherapy or in spite of it."
Here I want to dwell on oncologic treatment in the West. I witnessed how the sick children were brought to "heal" in the best hospitals in Europe. The huge money allocated by the Russian government for the treatment of children through Rusfond, as well as the money collected by kind people in amounts sometimes reaching $ 500,000 per child, "helped" only the hospitals to which these children were brought. In most cases, these patients received the same drugs and the same protocols of radiation therapy. The only difference was that the treatment continued to the end - that is, before the death of the child from complications of treatment.
Perhaps many of you will be surprised, but I believe that Russian oncologists come from a professional and moral point of view correctly when after a certain number of cycles of chemotherapy, and also understanding that severe treatment will not lead to a positive result, they let the patient go home. So, intentionally or not, they give the patient a small, but a chance, that the body will recover and will continue to fight cancer, or, having no other choice, the patient will look for other treatments that are more likely to lead to cure or stop the disease .
Many Russians who communicated with me and who won cancer with the help of folk or natural methods were just such "refuseniks". Working in expensive hospitals, foreign oncologists will gladly accept such "refuseniks" if they are willing to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for treatment. They will be courteous and attentive to them, leading to the inevitable result. Such a result will be death from complications of treatment, which in 99% of cases will be officially identified as "come as a result of the aggressiveness of the disease."
In the course of my research and work in the field of natural cancer therapies, I participate in many English-language blogs and seminars, and therefore I constantly communicate with people recovered from cancer 3-4-th degree and read or listen to their stories about how and how they were treated . According to my own 19 statistics from 20, such people were treated with natural methods (often after an unsuccessful and traumatic traditional oncological treatment).
I read a lot of books by the most famous authors, who cited hundreds of examples of curing people by this or that natural method. It is also known that Harry Huxley's clinics in 30-50-x. healed tens of thousands of people by his method. Canadian nurse Casey cured thousands of people with her iisiac tea. Max Gerson and his daughter Charlotte were cured by thousands of patients who have already been refused medicine. The Brzhinsky clinic in Texas has been treating the neglected cases of antineoplaston for more than 20 years (according to American legislation only such cases and only after passing the full traditional cancer treatment can be referred to his clinic) with much higher results than official oncology. Dr. Barton at his clinic in the Bahamas successfully treated many difficult types of cancer invented by him with immune serum. Many specialists today successfully use these and other methods of cancer treatment. All this is documented and available for both official organizations and simply for interested people. It is very rare to find those few who have recovered from traditional methods and, as a rule, they have overcome the disease not because of, but in spite of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery, destructive to the body as a whole and to immunity in particular. And most often - these are people who have been misdiagnosed, for example, with mammography errors or in the treatment of asymptomatic, extremely rarely malignant tumors such as Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS), which are almost never malignant. Women with this diagnosis get the whole arsenal of traditional oncology and if they survive after it, they supplement the positive statistics cured of cancer. Also, it can be people who have only crossed the 5-year-old barrier of cancer survival, which official oncology considers recovered, while secondary cancer diseases caused by traditional methods of treatment often appear only after 5-10 years.
The same fate is also experienced by men after a very inaccurate PSA test for prostate cancer. This cancer, even when diagnosed correctly, has a very slow growth. If this growth is not accelerated by the destruction of immunity and other important body systems, prostate cancer can remain asymptomatic for decades.
Despite the inaccuracy of these surveys leading to false diagnoses or "healing", when this is not required (in cases of precancerous conditions such as DCIS or slowly growing prostate tumors), official oncology not only is not going to change its diagnostic methods, bringing to it billions of dollars a year, but on the contrary, - is trying to cover more and more people with these supposedly preventive examinations. Over the last 10 years, more than 1 million (!) Women in the US have been mistakenly diagnosed and treated for cancer. Apparently, this state of affairs suits the medical establishment and the big business that controls it, because they earn the more, the more people are examined and the cancer is diagnosed.
Boris Grinblat
← Previous. Chapter 2 | Next. Chapter 4 →
Download the e-book for free
Download the book for free in DOC format
in English in English German in French in italian in Polish
Download the book for free in PDF format
in English in English German in French in italian in Polish