Table of contents
- Author warning
- About the Developer
- Prologue
- Chapter 1. What is the problem?
- Chapter 2. History of the dominance of allopathic medicine
- Chapter 3. Oncology - a thriving business
- Chapter 4. Theory of Cancer
- Chapter 5. Who is sick and why?
- Chapter 6. A new concept for the treatment and prevention of disease
- Chapter 7. "Cut, etch, burn" - traditional oncological methods
- Chapter 8. The main causes of the onset and development of cancer
- 1. Nutritional factor
- 2. Toxic factor
- 3. Psychological factor
- 4. Physical factor
- Chapter 9. The choice of the concept of cancer treatment. The determining factor in the success of treatment
- Chapter 10. An integrated approach to cancer treatment
- Chapter 11. Questions and answers that can save a patient's life
- Appendix:
- 1. A list of non-traditional cancer treatment clinics and the methods they use
- 2. List of used literature and other sources of information
← Previous. Chapter 1 | Next. Chapter 3 →
Chapter 2 - History of the Dominance of Allopathic Medicine
The history is written by the winners.
Winston Churchill
In the late XIX - early XX century in America and in Europe the following situation in medicine was created. The specialists of various profiles were engaged in treatment of patients in the same way: naturopaths, homeopaths, surgeons and many others who used the latest achievements of science of that time, as well as the experience of generations in the treatment of various diseases and conditions by natural means. From the middle of the XIX century in medicine there was a pronounced division into "emperics" and "allopaths".
Imperiki Are homeopaths, herbalists (phytotherapeutists), in general, all those who treated with natural remedies and followed the concept according to which a sick person needs only to help restore the natural balance, and he will cope with the disease.
Allopaths - those who used strong mineral and chemical means, surgery and bloodletting followed the concept that the symptoms of the disease should be eliminated and then the patient will recover.
Between the two directions a serious war was unleashed. The satirists in the newspapers portrayed this war as follows: in the case of the emperors, patients die from illness, and allopaths from treatment. Many people were afraid of allopathic medicine. But behind it stood the big money of bank magnates and owners of the chemical industry, producing minerals, coal and then oil. Allopathy was also greatly helped by the latest achievements of science - the invention of anesthesia and the introduction of aseptic and antiseptic drugs, which made it possible to use surgery much more widely as a therapeutic method, as well as the beginning of the synthesis of chemical preparations.[1]
[1] As, for example, aspirin (1897, Bayer concern).
In addition to the specialists who belonged to these two schools, at that time there were many charlatans of different stripes who easily obtained licenses for practice. There was no strict standard on which medical specialists could be qualified, as there was no organization that would do this.
In 1913, with the help of the leading oligarchs of America, controlling the oil and chemical industries (Rockefeller, Rothschild, Carnegie, Morgan), the Rockefeller Foundation was established, which began to raise the standard of medical schools. In fact, the oligarchs seized these medical schools and radically changed their program in favor of the absolute dominance of allopathic medicine in the curriculum of medical schools and the complete elimination of all natural trends in it, such as dietology, homeopathy, herbal medicine, etc.
For example, today, as Edward Griffin, author of "The World Without Cancer" says, doctors' wives know more about healthy nutrition than doctors themselves who spend only a few hours of their five-year training program on nutrition studies. But even Hippocrates, whose oath the doctors take, said that the food should be your medicine, and the medicine your food. I would also add that our grandmothers and great-grandmothers know more about medicinal herbs and their proper application than doctors, despite the fact that more than 80% of all pharmaceuticals are based on the properties of various ingredients of natural plants that were synthesized in the laboratory only with the aim of obtaining a patent and controlling the production of medicines.
Medical schools in America began to receive huge grants for those times (from $ 500 thousand to $ 1 million) in exchange for the appointment of 1-2 people from the Rockefeller Foundation to the director's council. Those in turn insisted on changing the medical curriculum, which now consisted exclusively of allopathy (pharmaceutical medicine). Medical students began to learn a new program, in which the treatment of patients consisted only in the use of synthesized chemicals and expensive procedures and operations.
Allopathic physicians began to call natural medicine unscientific, because at that time many successful natural methods could not be explained scientifically, whereas the action of chemical preparations on the body could already be explained[2]. From the same moment, the persecution of natural medicine began, which eventually became known as an alternative medicine. Those schools that did not agree to radically change the program did not receive a grant, and could not compete with allopathic medical schools.
[2] Only from the end of the twentieth century, limited research began on the effects of natural methods, many of which can be explained with the help of quantum physics.
Further, the aforementioned oligarchs renamed part of their chemical industry into a pharmaceutical industry, and then were able to infiltrate and fully control the American Medical Association[3] - an organization that by that time accredited medical schools. Thus, only schools that received grants from the Rockefeller Foundation and accepted allopathy, began to be accredited in America.
[3] American Medical Association.
For several decades, the whole of America and Europe adopted allopathy as the only form of official medicine. Large funds were used by these oligarchs for lobbying in the governments of Western countries laws that establish the complete dominance of allopathic medicine.
Thus, the circle was closed: the chemical industry began to penetrate all spheres of life, and, along with the ecology that was deteriorating due to it, began to lead to a constantly growing incidence of the population, the emergence of new diseases and the growth of those that previously were considered rare. So at the beginning of the XX century only 10% of all patients had chronic diseases. Today, this figure is more than 90%. The same oligarchic families own the largest pharmaceutical corporations, which are engaged in the production of medicines. Few people know that the 500 list of the world's richest corporations, the first 10 - pharmaceutical.
The huge capital that receives the "Big Pharma"[4], allow buying politicians, controlling the press and television, influencing regulators (such as the FDA[5] in America and their like in other countries), to fund scientific research that guarantees the desired result and, finally, to avoid criminal liability for the sale of drugs that lead to massive loss of life. So in the US there is a law that protects pharmaceutical concerns from lawsuits about the harm caused by the vaccines they sell. Compensation for such claims is handled by a state fund that uses taxpayer money.
Today, when allopathic medicine has achieved almost complete control, and oncology even has legislative support[6], cancer patients have no choice, and they are forced to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for mutilation treatment, which, at best, can not only prolong the painful existence of the patient, but, more often, significantly shortens it.
[4] Big Pharma (English) - a collegiate education, which includes the leading international pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies in the world.[5] Food and Drug Administration - Food and Drug Administration.[6] In the United States, Britain and many other countries, it is prohibited by law to practice alternative methods of oncology.
Several interesting facts that point to the methods of this dominance and monopolization of medicine by allopathy.
An organization such as the US FDA, which permits certain drugs to be used in the country, has rather stringent requirements and a multi-stage model for the passage of potential drugs to permit their use. This process costs today $ 500-800 million. Given that it is legally impossible to obtain a patent for a natural product (natural rather than synthetic), no pharmaceutical concern will be interested in paying such a sum, as it will not receive a patent guaranteeing exclusive production this drug, and, thereby, guaranteeing profit. Small independent companies simply can not raise this amount. In turn, the FDA strictly monitors that unauthorized natural preparations are not used, despite the age-old experience of using many of them.
Thus, many natural preparations and methods of treatment are officially banned. Fight honey. establishment with natural resources reaches that absurdity. It is well known that many fruits, vegetables and spices (cherries, turmeric, garlic, carrots, ginger), as well as some minerals (selenium, iodine, magnesium, Himalayan salt, etc.) have a strong positive therapeutic effect. But neither the manufacturer of products from these products, nor the seller has the right to mention their therapeutic effect in the treatment of specific diseases. This immediately raises this product (fruit, nut, bioadditive) in the category of medicine. And since there is no formal permission from the FDA to use it as a medical product, it automatically becomes banned. For this reason, many small producers, farmers and shops have big problems, and the potential buyer is not well informed about the diseases in which these natural products can help.
In order to maintain its financial interest, the medical establishment does its utmost to preserve the dominance of synthetic drugs in medicine and therefore spares no expense in discrediting all natural remedies, as insolvent, weak and often dangerous.
Also, the medical establishment rewrote the history of medicine and the history of its failures. In this version of history, old medicine appears to us as scientifically unreasonable and ineffective. For example, we are told that before the invention of antibiotics people could not treat infections. At the same time, it is not mentioned at all that a solution of colloidal silver was used with great success before antibiotics in the West with many infectious diseases, and also for prevention purposes. Colloidal silver has no side effects and an overdose; it was used as an antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal and antiparasitic agent. The role of other natural antibiotics, such as garlic, ginger, onion, echinacea, wild honey, black cumin oil, etc., is also downgraded or hushed up.
The history is also rewritten to show the success of vaccines. For example, we are assured that cases of such diseases as polio, diphtheria, smallpox, whooping cough, etc., have been eradicated or significantly reduced (by more than 95%) with the introduction of mass vaccination. In this case, 1900 data is usually compared to today. However, the fact that from 1900 before the beginning of mass vaccination at the end of 50-X - the beginning of 60-ies is hushed up, the incidence rate from these diseases fell by itself on 90-95%, which is explained by the improvement of social conditions of life and nutrition of people . At the same time, if vaccinations cause a massive outbreak among the vaccinated population, such diseases are usually reclassified to other pathological conditions. So hundreds of thousands of Americans who contracted polio as a result of vaccination at the end of the 50-X were diagnosed as suffering from flaccid paralysis or encephalitis. As a result of such fraud, the statistics of the incidence of poliomyelitis has not changed.
This "new" history of medicine was also well-flavored with various myths, similar to the fact that many diseases that are easily curable now were formerly incurable and that people lived much less and died from the mere trifles. These myths can be easily refuted. It is enough only to read from the classics about the wide range of diseases covered by doctors 100 years ago and how successful their treatment methods were to understand that the problem at that time was not the absence of synthetic drugs, but the lack of specialists and poor social conditions.
I remember one occasion when, about 10 years ago, my friend Andrew invited me to his son's baptism in a small English village near the town of Mansfield. The ceremony was held in the old beautiful church, and I decided to walk around it. Behind the church there was an old cemetery where there were burials from the end of the XVIII to the end of the XIX century. I was very surprised that most people buried there lived for 80-90 years or more. Of my meager knowledge of history and ideas about the living conditions of those years that I had then, I did not expect such longevity from the old inhabitants of this village in the north of England.
Boris Grinblat
← Previous. Chapter 1 | Next. Chapter 3 →
Download the e-book for free
Download the book for free in DOC format
in English in English German in French in italian in Polish
Download the book for free in PDF format
in English in English German in French in italian in Polish