Table of contents
- Author warning
- About the Developer
- Prologue
- Chapter 1. What is the problem?
- Chapter 2. History of the dominance of allopathic medicine
- Chapter 3. Oncology - a thriving business
- Chapter 4. Theory of Cancer
- Chapter 5. Who is sick and why?
- Chapter 6. A new concept for the treatment and prevention of disease
- Chapter 7. "Cut, etch, burn" - traditional oncological methods
- Chapter 8. The main causes of the onset and development of cancer
- 1. Nutritional factor
- 2. Toxic factor
- 3. Psychological factor
- 4. Physical factor
- Chapter 9. The choice of the concept of cancer treatment. The determining factor in the success of treatment
- Chapter 10. An integrated approach to cancer treatment
- Chapter 11. Questions and answers that can save a patient's life
- Appendix:
- 1. A list of non-traditional cancer treatment clinics and the methods they use
- 2. List of used literature and other sources of information
← Previous. Chapter 5 | Next. Chapter 7 →
Chapter 6 - A New Concept of Disease Treatment and Prevention
Doctors of the future will not treat a person with pills. They will treat and prevent illness by feeding.
Thomas Edison
The saying "Everything new is a well-forgotten old" is very appropriate here. Prior to the victory of allopathic medicine (ie, pharmaceutical, modern), this "new" concept was used by most doctors and physicians. In our time she received not only a scientific justification, but also a confirmation of her success by convincing results. Doctors Esselstin and McDougall treat severe forms of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular failure with a change in lifestyle and diet, and not only stop the disease process, but also achieve its regression. The methods of Raymond Francis, Bill Henderson, Lothar Hirneis and many other specialists based on this concept, heal even the 4 stage of cancer (for reasons why you are not familiar with this, see chapter 1). Nevertheless, honey. The establishment ignores these facts and continues to consider this concept obsolete and untenable.
The essence of this concept is that a healthy human body is a complex, perfect, self-regulating mechanism that successfully resists diseases. If the body becomes ill, then, in the presence of necessary conditions, it includes certain protective and compensatory mechanisms and itself cope with the disease. The specialist, however, can help create these conditions and thereby speed up or facilitate the body's healing process.
The process of the disease is accompanied by an energy and biochemical imbalance. Prior to the allopathic monopoly on treatment, the doctor's goal was to restore this balance (and, I hope, again in the near future). This creates an optimal environment for all life processes, both at the cellular level and in all body systems, which in turn leads to recovery from the disease.
In contrast, allopathic medicine in its conception of treatment directs it only to eliminate the external signs of the disease - symptoms. We now know that the symptoms of the disease are a manifestation of the protective and compensatory response of the organism to the pathological process, and their elimination does not lead to the elimination of its cause, but only removes its visible manifestations. The therapeutic principle of allopathy can be illustrated by the following example.
Imagine that you are driving a car and the oil change lamp on the dashboard lights up. You understand that you must react to this signal (symptom). At the first stop, you turn off the light bulb. The problem is no more - the light does not light. But only later this will have a very negative effect on the motor. And when a new problem appears, it will be solved in the same way, if, of course, the motor does not jam before this.
To be serious, almost all the treatments offered by modern medicine today are aimed at eliminating symptoms. For example, if the patient has high blood pressure, a pressure-reducing drug should be given; if increased cholesterol in the blood - to give statins[1]; if the headache (which can have dozens of causes) - give an anesthetic. The problem is aggravated by the fact that we are also accustomed to this approach. It is simple, fast and understandable. And the fact that this symptom will return later and the disease, which continues to develop asymptomatically, will lead to more serious consequences - we are of little interest at the present stage. The main thing is a quick relief from the symptom or its control.
[1] Statins are drugs for lowering cholesterol. They represent chemical substances that reduce the production of enzymes in the body, which are necessary for the synthesis of cholesterol in the body.
Every year more and more new diseases are registered. More precisely, these are new symptoms, sometimes even variations of the norm, which are declared new diseases. So, the recently discovered syndrome of hyperactivity in children, is just such a variety of norms of behavior and can, by the way, be regulated by a change in nutrition. Nevertheless, a quarter of American children are now actually put on strong psychotropic drugs, despite the fact that 95% of all massacres in American schools were committed by adolescents taking these drugs.
If the body reacts with a certain protective or compensatory response to the dysfunction of the organ or organ system, then trying to remove this reaction, we only aggravate the situation. Weakening the natural reaction of the body to the imbalance caused by the disease, we, therefore, give the disease the best chance for development.
Why does medicine today suggest that our body, which evolved to such a high level in the course of evolution, suddenly became so imperfect that its reactions to the pathological process must be corrected, or even removed altogether? Why is the perfect immunity developed for millions of years needed to be strengthened and adjusted by vaccines today? Why, for example, after a heart attack a patient starts frequent and superficial palpitations? Maybe it's just the compensatory reaction of the body to the defeat of the heart muscle? The weakened heart is so much easier to cope with maintaining a sufficient level of blood circulation for life. Nevertheless, this symptom is considered as pathological, and post-infarction patients are given B-blockers, slowing the heart rate. Maybe it is such a conceptually incorrect approach that explains why mortality from cardiovascular diseases in developed countries is in the first place.
Another example is the widespread use of statins - cholesterol-lowering drugs. Despite the fact that modern drugs such as Lipidor lower mainly "bad" cholesterol, nevertheless, complications from their use are today the most widespread.
First, the division into "bad" and "good" cholesterol is fundamentally flawed, but convenient for the pharmaceutical industry. There is no bad cholesterol, but there are molecules of cholesterol of different sizes, where large molecules are called "bad" cholesterol. "Bad" cholesterol also has its own functions for the body: the role in creating myelin of nerve fibers, in the formation of vitamin D in the skin under the sun, in normal brain function, in the delivery of lipids to damaged cells.
Interfering with the normal exchange of cholesterol, we cause great harm to the body. An increase in the level of "bad" cholesterol may indicate that a high level of insulin, as a response to consuming large amounts of sugar and flour, damaged many cells and they now need material for repair. When doctors give us statins, they really reduce the level of cholesterol production in the liver. But this very quickly leads to serious disorders in the cardiovascular, muscular and other systems of the body.
It would be much more correct to remove the cause of the increase in cholesterol and seriously change the diet, lowering the content of simple sugars and animal products, but then the sales of statins would fall right away, and today it is the best-selling class of drugs. Also, medicine would lose a huge number of patients who will have numerous complications that will also need to be treated both permanently and outpatiently. And similar examples, when symptomatic treatment brings great harm to the body, can lead to a whole book.
I would like the reader to think again and ask the following questions. What is behind this obviously irrational approach to the treatment of sick people? Why do doctors treat the symptoms, not the cause of the disease? Why are expensive and dangerous examinations prescribed when there are much cheaper and safer (for example, mammography and thermography)? Why is such an expensive and dangerous operation done, as shunting in atherosclerosis of the coronary arteries, which most often only for weeks and months inhibits the development of the process?
The aforementioned doctors, Esselstin and McDougall, are regressing the atherosclerotic process with only a radical change in diet.
In the treatment of cancer patients, there is still more irrationality. To eliminate the symptom of the cancerous process, which is a tumor, oncologists use the tactics of "excision, burning and etching." This leads the body into such a serious condition that until the cancer does not defeat the weakened patient, he will need massive medical assistance. However, the year of such treatment, for example, in America, can cost more than $ 100,000 dollars.
Let's look at this from a different point of view. If the profit is at the head of the corner, and not the patient's cure, then this approach becomes immediately understandable and rational. On healthy people, as well as on the dead, a lot of money is not earned. Huge profits are earned by supporting people in an intermediate, sick state, as well as finding new contrived diseases in healthy people (especially psychiatric). The treatment of these new diseases in healthy people, as well as those to whom the diagnosis was incorrectly diagnosed[2], leads to the emergence of real pathological conditions that will require treatment. Thus, in addition to existing patients, whose illnesses are treated for years "symptomatically," a new category of patients appears, who will need long and often lifelong treatment.
[2] Breast cancer after mammograms and prostate cancer after a PSA test have an error up to 1 / 3 cases).
Let's now take a closer look at the new concept of treatment of diseases
It is believed that all known diseases are artificially grouped symptoms (ie, protective reactions of the body), which were coined with convenient names. By the way, this process continues today - hundreds of new diseases and pathological conditions are added annually. Many new diseases are caused by new conditions that have developed as a result of the use of pharmaceuticals, unhealthy foods and household toxins. Since our interest here is cancer, we will consider this concept on the example of cancer.
Cancer is cell dysfunction, "says Raymond Francis, a well-known scientist who heals himself of 4 stage cancer and the author of Never Again Fear Cancer[3]. The cause of this dysfunction is either the lack of nutrients due to poor nutrition, and / or toxic factors (not only chemical, but also physical, such as radiation, microwave irradiation, Wi-Fi, etc.).
[3] Never fear cancer again, Raymond Francis.
For these reasons, I would also like to add the shortage of energy received by cells or the effect of negative energy, both from natural sources and coming from our brain (see chapter 5). As a result, there is a weakening of the electrical charge of the cell, which in turn is expressed in a decrease in its vital activity, which leads to a change in the intracellular environment. This, in turn, leads to a cascade of processes within the cell, the consequence of which is the inclusion of the ancient genetic mechanism of cell survival (what oncologists call a cancer mutation of the cell's DNA gene).
Thus, we have only one pathological condition - a diseased cell. From the localization of this affected cell (in what tissue or organ it is) depends on the set of symptoms by which its dysfunction will manifest itself. In oncology, the type of cell and its localization will depend on both the histological and the main diagnosis. According to the new concept of treatment, it is necessary to create the affected cell normal conditions for its existence and functioning. The cell then will recover itself and the symptomatology caused by it will go away.
With respect to cancer cells, the restoration of a normal pericellular and intracellular environment will lead to the restoration of the cancer cell to normal or the inclusion of apoptosis in it[4].
[4] Apoptosis is a programmed biological death of a cell, a regulated self-destruction process at the cellular level.
This explanation is a strong simplification, but, nevertheless, reflects the essence of this new concept. Despite the fact that its practical application is a rather multifaceted and complex treatment process, which sometimes requires a radical change in the way of life, nevertheless, it is within the power of every person, has no complications and is much cheaper. Such treatment has a much better recovery than the extremely low results that are observed today in medicine and not only from cancer, but also from other chronic diseases such as cardiovascular insufficiency, diabetes, atherosclerosis, multiple sclerosis and others. I think that very many cancer patients going to surgical, chemotherapeutic or radiotherapy would choose treatment based on this concept if they had the necessary information.
For successful treatment of this concept, it is necessary to understand its principles:
- treatment is aimed at eliminating the cause of the disease (because a cancer is just a symptom of the cancer process, not its cause, and is based on cell dysfunction caused by toxins, poor nutrition or reduced energy);
- careful detoxication of the body;
- rapid transition to proper nutrition (strict anti-cancer diet) in order to give the cells the necessary nutrients;
- exclusion or significant reduction of toxic, negative and other harmful factors from their lives (ie exclusion of factors that caused cancer);
- restoration of the energy level (physical activity, positive attitude, use of natural factors: sun, earth, air);
- use of properly selected dietary supplements to restore the balance of the sick organism and compensate for the chronic shortage of vitamins, minerals and other bioactive elements.
Understanding these principles, it becomes clear why such seemingly simple methods as proper nutrition, physical activity, meditation, the use of natural factors, regular body cleansing, lifestyle changes, the use of dietary supplements and others like them are the basis for healing many, even hopeless, cancer patients. The same methods treat other serious chronic diseases, such as diabetes, cardiovascular insufficiency, Alzheimer's disease, immunodeficiency states, etc. It is with this treatment that the cell receives the energy and nutrients it needs, and the decrease in the level of toxins in the body, as well as a decrease their income with a change in lifestyle, creates a healthy surrounding and intracellular environment, which is necessary for its normal life. Such a cell will cope with pathogens and become an energy generator, will successfully perform its function, timely exchange information with other cells of the body through biochemical and physical pathways (photons, electrons, waves) and thus participate in the maintenance of normal functioning of the whole organism.
Let's now see what effect the standard oncological methods have on the cell
All three known methods cause serious damage both at the cellular level in the zone of "therapeutic" effect, and in all vital systems of the body. There is stress and the subsequent depression of the immune system. Stress disrupts metabolic processes at the cellular level, which makes the condition of an already suffering cell even more difficult. In damaged tissues, inflammation occurs, which promotes the spread of the process.
Chemotherapy is a poison, which affects all the rapidly growing cells of the body (and not only cancer, as many believe). Immune cells, hematopoiesis, intestinal epithelium, sex cells and hair follicle cells are destroyed and damaged. In addition, cells of the organs of the systems that detoxify (in our case, chemotherapeutic drugs) from the body: the liver, the kidneys, suffer greatly. Thus, not only diseased cells (cancer, precancerous) suffer, but also other healthy cells of the body, thereby greatly weakening it. Finally, chemotherapy causes a strong acidosis in the tissues, and as a result, oxygen saturation is further reduced, which makes the cells even more vulnerable to cancer. At the same time, the included "ancient" genetic mechanism allows cancer cells to more easily tolerate harmful toxic factors, such as irradiation and chemotherapy. Now, healthy cells will lose nutrients due to a disruption in metabolism and cell death of the intestinal epithelium; because of the affected liver and kidney function they will be surrounded by a more toxic environment; and because of the weakened immune system - will be more susceptible to the actions of pathogens. All this leads to the spread of the pathological process in a weakened organism.
The patient will need to choose between two opposite approaches to the treatment of a potentially fatal disease. Unfortunately, the fear and pressure exerted by doctors severely limits the patient's consciousness. But to make a decision in favor of treating a "new" concept, a free, open mind and the ability to think rationally is absolutely necessary. Only then will the patient be able to free himself from the thinking imposed on the establishment by the myths that support this thinking and objectively weigh all the facts. Such a change of thinking is not a simple process, and, unfortunately, not everyone can do it. A person, depressed by such a diagnosis as cancer, is much easier to entrust their health and life to a "specialist". Patients often do not have the time, the desire and the strength to understand, for example, that oncologists are not specialists in getting rid of cancer. They are specialists in cancer treatment with chemotherapy, surgery and radiation therapy. And this, unfortunately, is not the same thing.
In conclusion, I would like to cite an observation that does not quite fit the topic of this chapter, but it can be very important for making the right decision about choosing a treatment concept and, accordingly, a specialist.
According to statistics, doctors have one of the shortest lives and one of the highest rates of suicide. Many doctors are overweight, look tired, irritated and painful.
In contrast, naturopaths and doctors who have adopted a new concept look much better than their colleagues. They are active professionally and physically to very advanced years. So, for example, Colin Campbell, author of the bestselling "Chinese study"[5] on the effect of diet on chronic diseases, in its 79 years running daily, has just released a new book, regularly travels around the world with lectures. He lives by the principles he himself promotes. Bill Henderson, author of "Without Cancer"[6], already on 9-th ten, but continues active educational work and also looks beyond the years. The well-known surgeon Dr. Esselstin, disillusioned with the bad results of the methods of modern medicine, began to treat patients with a change in diet and lifestyle, while he himself follows the same principles, setting a good example for the rest. Today to him 79, he is an avid cyclist and continues his work.
It turns out that very often a doctor is like a shoemaker without boots, i.e. doctor without health. Personally, this factor seems very revealing.
[5] Colin T Campbell, "China Study". Was published in Russian in the publishing house "Mann, Ivanov and Ferber" in 2013 year.[6] Bill Henderson, "Cancer Free".
Boris Grinblat
← Previous. Chapter 5 | Next. Chapter 7 →
Download the e-book for free
Download the book for free in DOC format
in English in English German in French in italian in Polish
Download the book for free in PDF format
in English in English German in French in italian in Polish