Table of contents
- Author warning
- About the Developer
- Prologue
- Chapter 1. What is the problem?
- Chapter 2. History of the dominance of allopathic medicine
- Chapter 3. Oncology - a thriving business
- Chapter 4. Theory of Cancer
- Chapter 5. Who is sick and why?
- Chapter 6. A new concept for the treatment and prevention of disease
- Chapter 7. "Cut, etch, burn" - traditional oncological methods
- Chapter 8. The main causes of the onset and development of cancer
- 1. Nutritional factor
- 2. Toxic factor
- 3. Psychological factor
- 4. Physical factor
- Chapter 9. The choice of the concept of cancer treatment. The determining factor in the success of treatment
- Chapter 10. An integrated approach to cancer treatment
- Chapter 11. Questions and answers that can save a patient's life
- Appendix:
- 1. A list of non-traditional cancer treatment clinics and the methods they use
- 2. List of used literature and other sources of information
← Previous. Chapter 3 | Next. Chapter 5 →
Chapter 4 - Theory of Cancer
My goal in this chapter is not to convince a specialist or scientist of the correctness of the arguments of one or the other theory, giving a lot of facts and references, and to show the reader two mutually exclusive mechanisms of the origin of cancer. Understanding the differences in these mechanisms makes it possible to see and understand the differences in the approach to cancer treatment with modern oncology and its natural alternative. This will help to understand the principle underlying many natural cancer treatments that are used successfully today.
Modern medicine has adopted a mutagenic theory of cancer, which underlies the diagnosis and treatment, as well as the almost non-existent prevention of this disease. If you try to briefly describe its essence, then for unknown reasons in the cell there is a mutation (DNA breakdown), which leads to radical changes in its vital activity and makes the cell carcinogenic, i.e. cancerous. That in turn begins to actively share, forming a tumor, which is the cause of the disease. Sometimes these changes in the cell are due to "cancer" genes, which again for unknown reasons are included overnight and cause the appearance of a tumor.
An example of such genes can serve recently discovered breast cancer genes BRCA1, BRCA2. It was their presence that led Angelina Jolie to "preventive" removal of both her breasts. And as modern oncology explains, these mutations in the genes of healthy cells can occur suddenly, and the causes are either breakdowns in genes that grow with age, or other regulator genes and disease genes that include the very process of tumor formation.
Thus, people cultivate a fatalistic attitude towards cancer, because the insidious disease can suddenly strike each of us: skinny and full; and athletes and office workers; young and old; those who lead a healthy lifestyle and those who have McDonald's - a way of life. It is necessary to treat this attack only by the most severe methods: surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, since other less powerful methods with such a disease can not cope.
Of course honey. The establishment recognizes certain factors that may increase the likelihood of the disease. These include several obvious, but far from the most basic factors: smoking, alcohol, radiation. Thus, modern medicine convinces us that the cause of the tumor is the inclusion of a cancer gene or a normal mutation, and that the only correct solution is to remove the tumor by one of the above methods or a combination thereof. No tumor - no problem.
Let us now see how consistent this genetic mutagen theory
Back in 80, it was decided to begin work on reading the entire genetic code of a person. Taking into account the fact that according to official medicine, it is our genes that control the body, and considering that about 100 thousand different proteins are known in our body, it was expected to find 100 thousand genes responsible for these proteins in the human genome and approximately 50 thousand genes that control their work. To everyone's surprise, only about 20 thousand genes were determined. What does this tell us? The fact that there are no controlling genes and that one gene can be responsible for the synthesis of several proteins. Then what controls these genes themselves? What causes one gene to initiate the synthesis of various proteins?
It turns out that various factors affecting the cell cause different reactions within the cell and lead to the fact that a certain region of DNA is opened for the synthesis of a new protein.
Bruce Lipton, the founder of the science of epigenetics, proved by his studies that if the conditions in which the cell is located change, it will behave differently, synthesizing different proteins, which in turn affect the change not only of the function of the cell, but also to change its morphology. From this it follows that the factors controlling the genes are the factors of the extracellular environment, which include toxins, nutrients, the difference in electrical potential between the cell and the intercellular space, hormones and other controlling biochemical substances, as well as microwaves, electromagnetic field, radiation, e.
On most of these factors, we can influence our perception of the conditions around us and our behavior. Thus, our perception of these factors, our behavior with respect to these factors, is the control that genetics did not find that were looking for controlling genes.
If to simplify understanding greatly simplify the picture, then most of us make the following destructive choices in our lives that directly affect the state of cells in our body.
We eat in fast food establishments, and as a result, our cells do not receive much of the necessary nutrients and vitamins, but they get carcinogens in the form of flavor enhancers and preservatives. Instead of water, we drink Coca-Cola, containing 13 spoons of sugar and almost deadly chemical composition. Instead of the healthy fats needed for our cells, we, using french fries and many other dishes, get trash that change the normal operation of the cell membrane, violating its permeability (the necessary substances do not go inside, the used substances do not go out).
We do not move much, spending time in the office, and at home - drinking beer or wine with a carcinogenic preservative in front of the TV.
Our propaganda washed honey. The establishment of the brain deprives us of many natural benefits. When leaving for rest, we smear carcinogenic sunscreen, protecting ourselves from the sun (and vitally important vitamin D, which protects against all types of cancer by 80%). We brush teeth with paste with neurotoxin and carcinogen fluoride. We vaccinate ourselves and our children, knocking down natural immunity and causing numerous autoimmune diseases, chronic diseases, allergies and even cancer (a cancer-causing SV40 virus in polio vaccines, for example).
We are in constant stress from everyday problems, which knocks down our normal metabolism, increases inflammatory processes, which are often precancerous conditions.
We are experiencing that when we come to the age of the pope, mother, uncle, aunt, etc., who died of cancer, then the same will happen to us. This only adds to the daily stress and can act as a nocebo effect[1], when the fear and expectation of a disease significantly increase the likelihood of the disease.
[1] The effect of "nocebo" is the opposite of the placebo effect. In the case of the "placebo" effect, the patient is suggestive and / or believes in a positive effect, in fact receives one.
What can we expect from the lifestyle and perception described above? How will cells of our body react to such factors? What genes will they activate?
When a cell receives less nutrients and is in a toxic environment, normal processes in it are violated. Cellular mitochondria produce much less energy, the combustion of oxygen is disturbed, the pH of the cytoplasm shifts to acidosis and numerous microbes, viruses, fungi enter the cell. This condition can cause mutations in the DNA of the cell and bring it to a quick death. However, nature has several protective mechanisms that it includes to save the cell and the whole organism. But more on that later.
So, if we trace the whole chain, then our way of life, behavior and perception of reality determine the environment in which the cell is located. This environment, as a result of its toxicity and lack of nutrients, changes the state of the cell. These changes concern not only the structure of the cell (irregular lipids in the membrane), but also its functions. This changes the inner environment of the cell - the cytoplasm. Strong changes in the internal environment lead to a change in the DNA of the cell - the expression of genes and their mutation. Thus, we have several "dominoes" put in a row. If you push the first, then the second, then the third, and so on, will fall behind it, triggering the process. Honey. the establishment intentionally identified the sixth "mutagenic" domino, since it is the most fatalistic and in its view is least subjected to the factor of our influence. He also knows, but he hides the amazing ability of our cells to correct the genetic mutations that occur in it. This mechanism is quite perfect and corrects the vast majority of genetic errors.
Thus, the mutagenic theory of cancer is an artificially isolated step from the process, convenient for creating a fatalistic attitude of the patient to this disease that is beneficial for the medical establishment.
Boris Grinblat