Table of contents
- Author warning
- About the Developer
- Prologue
- Chapter 1. What is the problem?
- Chapter 2. History of the dominance of allopathic medicine
- Chapter 3. Oncology - a thriving business
- Chapter 4. Theory of Cancer
- Chapter 5. Who is sick and why?
- Chapter 6. A new concept for the treatment and prevention of disease
- Chapter 7. "Cut, etch, burn" - traditional oncological methods
- Chapter 8. The main causes of the onset and development of cancer
- 1. Nutritional factor
- 2. Toxic factor
- 3. Psychological factor
- 4. Physical factor
- Chapter 9. The choice of the concept of cancer treatment. The determining factor in the success of treatment
- Chapter 10. An integrated approach to cancer treatment
- Chapter 11. Questions and answers that can save a patient's life
- Appendix:
- 1. A list of non-traditional cancer treatment clinics and the methods they use
- 2. List of used literature and other sources of information
Chapter 11 - Questions and Answers That Can Save the Patient's Life
"You will not believe how many officials from Food and Drag Administration, their relatives and friends, and directors of organizations such as the American Medical Association, American Cancer Sesayti, or the presidents of official oncological institutions come to Hanover for treatment. It is a fact".
Dr. Hans Nipper,
specialist in alternative cancer treatment.
Over the past few years, I've talked a lot with different people about the alternative view of oncology. I also spend a lot of time on blogs and forums discussing this topic. This helps me understand the attitude of people towards this acute topic and their general awareness. It is important to analyze this communication in forums, which allows me to identify factors that prevent the perception of this information by a certain part of people. Here I would like to turn to the practical side of this problem. For example, many of those who learned that traditional cancer treatment have a much more successful alternative, as well as those who actively criticize it, usually ask me similar questions. Most of these questions are rhetorical and do not suggest a well-reasoned answer. The question is asked in a manner that already implies an apparently obvious answer, which makes the continuation of the conversation meaningless. It is the availability of such a ready "obvious answer", previously formed in the subconscious mind of a person with the help of a sophisticated brainwashing system, that prevents further perception of this necessary information. On these, as well as other, more focused questions, I would like to give short answers in this chapter.
Most Frequently Asked Questions on Cancer Forums Regarding an Alternative View of Oncology
Question 1
Why does not medicine use these methods? If there really were means that cured cancer, then medicine would have used them for a long time.
Response
This question demonstrates the conviction of the questioner that the goal of medicine is to give people health and eradicate diseases. This view is imposed on us by the establishment. In reality, medicine is one of the largest and most profitable businesses, which includes or is connected with the largest pharmaceutical and insurance concerns, companies for the production of medical equipment, and also has a huge army of workers of different levels and specialties. Medicine is also a means of managing and controlling the population. The more people are busy with their illnesses, the less they will think about solving social problems. The more people die from illness before reaching old age, the less the state will spend on pension payments and free treatment of pensioners. However horrible this may sound, but the observation during the last 50-60 years for the activity of honey. establishment, legislated by many Western governments, leads only to this conclusion.
Now let's try to imagine how a healthy, long-lived population will reflect on the reign of the medical establishment that has been established for decades. Together with the huge costs and the likely collapse of business, most of the control over the population will be lost; people will have a lot of free time and they will begin to take a deeper interest in the existing state of things and will also be able to see and understand that they live in an artificially created for them world far from realizing the potential of their capabilities.
From this it can be concluded that the real discoveries in medicine concerning the healing of people from serious illnesses are not beneficial to honey. establishment neither economically, nor politically. This industry has so strongly discredited itself that it is hardly appropriate to endow it with some kind of humane concepts. Unfortunately, not a single major business and most of the major politicians will act to the detriment of their interests. That is why the establishment's war is so ruthless with successful and often inexpensive methods of treatment. Some alternative cancer therapies are very affordable in terms of cost, and at an average cost of up to $ 100 per month, they outperform the traditional methods by a factor of ten, while being practically safe.
Question 2
What is the sense of pharmaceutical companies and honey. the establishment to prohibit or ignore natural alternatives to their traditional methods (chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy)? If these natural substances really cured cancer, then they would have earned huge money on this.
Response
Many natural alternative methods have an average of 90% success in cancer treatment[1], while the average success of official oncology is equal to 3-5%[2]. Even these 3-5% are not a valid indicator, since they only indicate the percentage of survivors for 5 years. Very often carcinogenic in its essence, chemotherapy causes secondary cancers after 5-15 years after treatment.
[1] This applies to newly diagnosed patients who have not yet undergone crippling methods of official oncology.
[2] If you do not take into account the statistical distortions of honey. The establishment does not take into account some of the most common deadly forms of cancer (such as small cell lung cancer), but precancerous conditions (such as the encapsulated carcinoma of the milk duct, etc.) are taken into account.
Nevertheless, the official medicine will treat you by having 3% success, and Big Pharma will produce medicines for this treatment. The reason is that these drugs are synthesized, which means they are patented and bring a huge income. Natural products can not be patented. That is why no pharmaceutical company will spend about 1 billion dollars for permission to sell a drug that can not be patented.
There is another reason why Big Pharma does not want to sell drugs made from natural sources. After all, this can indicate to many people (who believe that drugs can be treated only by chemically synthesized by Big Pharma drugs) that it is possible to seek a remedy among natural natural sources that are accessible to many and not controlled by it. Given that some natural remedies can successfully treat several different conditions at once (turmeric, for example, has the strongest anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer effect, is an antioxidant and antiseptic and is used in the treatment of more than 100 different diseases), it can cause a sharp decrease in the consumption of synthesized drugs that , mainly aimed only at maintaining the patient's condition through his symptomatic treatment. This in turn will cause a domino effect, where not only Big Pharma will suffer great damage, but the work of many clinics, diagnostic centers and other medical institutions will suffer from the fact that people will successfully cure their diseases with available natural means.
Question 3
How can "herbs" and diet help in cancer treatment, if chemotherapy does not help?
Response
For the last 100 years, medicine has moved farther and farther away from the principle that if the body gets everything it needs from its environment, then it will not suffer from chronic diseases (which include cancer), and it will quickly and easily cope with acute diseases. However, this principle is even more relevant today, when we all experience nutrient deficiencies in the abundance of food, as the soil has become very poor, and the process of industrial food production removes from our food an already scarce amount of necessary nutrients. What does our body (or rather its anatomical and functional unit - cell) need for a painless existence? We need 90 microelements, 16 vitamins, 12 essential amino acids and 3 essential fatty acids. Note that among these substances there is no chemotherapy - our cells do not need it!
Medicine deliberately puts a high barrier for the treatment of serious illnesses. You want to be convinced that if the disease is serious, then the treatment should be very expensive, complex and dangerous. Does not it remind you of the approach of a dishonest mechanic inspecting your car, which understands that you absolutely do not understand the subject? He will expose you an expensive bill, and besides he will fill in the bad oil, so that you can return to him as soon as possible.
There are many examples where the severity of the disease and the high mortality rate do not completely correlate with the severity, complexity and toxicity of the treatment. Take, for example, a huge number of deaths from scurvy, from which hundreds of thousands of people died in agony in past centuries. The treatment was extremely simple: lemons and limes, i.e. vitamin C. As soon as sailors began to take boxes with citrus fruits, so immediately mortality from scurvy, which previously mowed up to half the crew of the ship, completely disappeared. Cancer is primarily a chronic disorder of cell metabolism due to lack of nutrients, toxicity, stress, trauma, radiation, the effects of various pathogens, or a combination of these factors. If the normal metabolism of the cell is restored (ie, replenishing the deficiency in the body of nutrients and eliminating other causative factors), the cancer process will stop and the immunity will cope with the tumor.
That is why "herbs" (which actually include all natural remedies: minerals, herbal remedies, dietary supplements) and diet (which compensates for the lack of essential elements in the body, and limits the supply of toxins to the body) are simple in principle and inexpensive method of treatment of cancer and other chronic diseases. And expensive, toxic and dangerous chemotherapy, like radiotherapy with surgery, is just a trick of the unscrupulous "mechanic" from our example, which is official medicine.
Question 4
Why do you think that what you are saying is true? I saw in the official sources absolutely the opposite information. Where is the proof? They are not in official sources!
Response
Many people confuse the notion of "official" with "objective" or "independent." The official source will issue such information, which supports the existing concept of the establishment, of which medicine is a part. And for today it will be wrong to limit the consideration of this state of affairs to the limits of only a certain country. Most mass media of developed countries are now connected by one concept of the global economic dominance of the largest corporations. Today's establishment is the central banks of developed countries, the largest transnational corporations and politicians working for them. Therefore, official sources in these countries serve the interests of these people and organizations. So, if you quote me as a counterargument from a Western newspaper, medical journal, television broadcast or even Wikipedia (now it's a source of information working for the establishment) to prove my wrongness, then this will not at all be an irrefutable proof of the rightness of the establishment in this issue. In addition, you deprive yourself of the opportunity to objectively explore the topic and make an informative decision for yourself.
Many people imagine honey. the establishment and the Big Pharm in particular, as big innocent giants, who are attacked by an army of naturalists, embittered by their non-recognition, as well as people disillusioned with official medicine. In reality, these "innocent giants" are waging a brutal and merciless war, smashing any opposition, buying media and imposing a "reality" that is acceptable to them.
Therefore, if the opponents of natural treatments want to argue reasonably, I would recommend that they first conduct their own objective research of both positions. At the same time, they must understand the most obvious tricks of the information war of the establishment, unleashed against natural alternatives.
So, for example, if the mass media ignores important scientific discoveries, new methods of treatment or certain events, this does not mean that they do not deserve attention. It just indicates that they are contrary to the official position. It is also necessary to take into account that for every scientific work, the results of which can destroy this official position, the medical establishment will pay the same or more works with the results acceptable to it.
Thus, when an interested person appeals for clarifying the question of alternative oncology to an official source, the information he will find there will be aimed at strengthening the position of honey. establishment and discrediting any alternative. Very often research on this topic by many people on this and ends.
Question 5
It turns out that all doctors provokers and pests?
Response
Of course not. Many (but not all!) Doctors are highly educated people who came to medicine to help patients, and they wholeheartedly gave the oath to Hippocrates. However, the education that they receive in medical institutions is built in such a way that the interests of the establishment are primarily served, which is almost always done at the expense of causing harm to patients. Medical education causes people to respect their complexity and inaccessibility. The noble role of doctors is portrayed in numerous serials and television programs. Thus, people are formed the opinion that doctors are excellent professionals who know everything about diseases and their treatment, and therefore, if the doctor prescribes treatment, this is undoubtedly the best option for the patient. Unfortunately, this is far from the truth. The doctor's knowledge about the methods of treating diseases is surprisingly one-sided and focused on pharmacology. Knowledge in the field of physiology is very limited by the chemical side of the question and almost does not take into account its physical side: the sun (photons), electricity (electrons), waves and fields. The influence of the psyche on physiology is also hardly studied, except for a brief familiarity with the placebo effect. Knowledge of the healthy diet and the role of numerous nutrients in the body in general, practically absent, For 5-6 years of medical training, the issues of healthy nutrition and dietology are allotted only a few hours.
All this explains the fact that doctors have the first choice in the treatment of diseases will be foreign to our body pharmaceuticals, the needs of which the body does not feel at all. With the same natural methods, many doctors are simply unfamiliar. Moreover, in almost all Western countries the doctor will be limited in his choice of treatment by strict protocols authorized by official medicine, and for the use of natural methods can be punished.
Another important factor of the doctor's limited knowledge is that even those who continue their education receive it from controlled meds. the establishment of professional journals or organized courses and seminars.
You can not ignore the simple human factor. Doctors are not angels, but the same people with all their inherent traits and shortcomings. Many will defend the official point of view only because they have followed her entire professional life, and this is what they know and understand. Of course, there are also those who understand the essence of what is happening, but either does not find the courage to go against the system, or for some reason they are satisfied with the existing state of things.
Therefore, doctors are not provocateurs and pests, but their opinion basically reflects the position of official medicine, which does not pursue the patient's interests at all.
Question 6
And you that - the oncologist? How can you know how to cure cancer?
Response
Oncologists are not taught to cure cancer. They are taught to treat it with chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery. It is not the same. That is why the treatment offered by oncologists is usually long, painful and in 97% of cases unsuccessful, because the success of these methods averages 3%. I would like to give an example here which, thanks to the use of analogy, makes it easy to understand the absurdity of traditional approaches to solving this problem.
Imagine that you have an expensive antique table in your office. And there were tree bugs that periodically run around the table and irritate you. You decided to get rid of them. What are you going to do? You can ask for help from an experienced woodcutter, who masterfully handles a chain saw, will destroy all bugs, and they will not bother you anymore. However, in this case you will not have a table either. You can also invite a high-level welder who, with a torch of a welder, will burn insolent insects, and with them your expensive table. Alternatively, you can go to the chemical laboratory and ask the worker with a scientific degree to pick the strongest poison, to destroy the invertebrates arthropods living in your desktop. The worker will process your table with a lot of strong acid, which will destroy them all ... together with the table. Seeing your suffering in choosing a method, your housewife will offer you to take a simple fly swatter and flatten out a little nagger who dared to appear to your eyes. This option will bring you the greatest satisfaction.
Thus, a simple housewife with a practical understanding of things offered you the most rational choice in which you destroy annoying bugs and at the same time save your favorite table. From this it can be concluded that for advice on how to cure cancer, I would not go to an oncologist who will burn, etch or cut a tumor. And would address to such expert who would not be limited to official medical education and which can freely choose a method of treatment. And first of all he must take care of preserving my body (the table in our example), and not about the destruction or reduction of the tumor. Such specialists include some doctors and scientists who have left official oncology or were dismissed by it. Specialists in natural methods of medicine (naturopaths, homeopaths, phytotherapists) can be very competent in the treatment of oncology. Interestingly, even some people far removed from medicine, such as Bill Henderson and Ty Bollinger, have become well-known authors in the world of alternative oncology. After the death of their loved ones, they completely gave themselves up to the question of finding more successful and less crippling methods of treatment. After many years of research, being not limited to a one-sided formal treatment approach and having a free choice of information, they certainly now know about cancer and about successful methods of its treatment incomparably more than a conventional oncologist. They continue their research work today, hold seminars and help hundreds of people get cured of cancer.
In other words, the opinion of an oncologist will certainly be professional, but it will be far from your ultimate goal - a complete cure for cancer. In this situation, the patient himself must decide what kind of professional he will need to fight this disease: one that will heal the patient, restoring the vital forces of his organism, or one that will destroy the tumor, destroying together with it and his life forces .
Question 7
Again these conspiracy theories of a worldwide conspiracy ?! Yes, it is beneficial for any state to have a healthy population in order that it will work more and better, which means that it is in its interest to find a cure for cancer treatment!
Response
It is indisputable that the economic model of Western countries exerts a great influence on all spheres of life throughout the world, including medicine. However, the economic situation in America, England and other developed countries is such that production is steadily declining due to outsourcing (moving production to poor countries), while the remaining plants and factories in these countries are increasing robotics processes. The main income of such countries is the financial industry and neocolonialism in the form of endless allegedly anti-terrorist wars in oil-rich or other resource-rich countries. Thus, former workers in the sphere of production are steadily replenishing the ranks of the unemployed. Now it is time that a large number of healthy people no longer need the state. All these countries have huge debts, and so many social payments have to be cut, including benefits and pensions. In addition, many people lose their private pensions due to the fact that companies have also begun to cut them. Either they just lost them in the stock market or went bankrupt. The state in such cases guarantees a minimum pension. If we reject the ethical side of the question (and it simply does not exist for modern Western politicians), from a purely material point of view, it is not beneficial for states to have many healthy people, as well as many pensioners.
This is not a "secret theory", but, unfortunately, a cold statement of facts.
Question 8
Why then does the media say nothing about alternative cancer treatments and their success?
Response
Here you need to make a little clarification. This question is most often asked me by interlocutors from England and America. That's where you can not find anything on this topic in newspapers or on television! In any case, if something slips, then expect a massive refutation in the near future and a massive company to discredit the source and author of the program. To my great surprise in Russia it is much more often possible to meet quite informative programs and articles on these topics. Nevertheless, major publications and channels also bypass this issue. There are two main reasons for this: 1) the global ideological agenda, conditioned by various ways of influence and the 2) economic agenda. The first category includes the influence of the largest pharmacological concerns and all Western honey. establishment on the nature of medicine in. The second, economic reason, is explained quite simply. If you take professional medical journals or large prints, they are either financed by Big Pharma, or get a lot of money from its representatives for advertising. Look at how many medical magazines contain advertisements for pharmaceuticals! What do you think, what decision will a practical editor accept, if putting an article about the successes of alternative cancer treatment he risks losing most of the advertising from Big Pharma? In addition, he still risks the reputation of his journal, as well as honey. The establishment rarely forgives such liberties. The answer is obvious. That is why the mainstream publications and programs should not be perceived by the party of a similar theme as interested in the person interested in it as an indicator that this topic does not deserve attention. Quite the opposite - if you understand how and how the media lives, then it's the fact of unwillingness to cover this issue that should give it more credibility.
Question 9
Why is there no evidence of the success of alternative methods? Prove the evidence!
Response
Part of this question is answered by my answer to the question 7. Indeed, there is almost no evidence in favor of natural alternatives to traditional methods of treating cancer in the media. However, there are plenty of them in other sources. You just need to be able to look for them, and also be able to notice them. There are a lot of scientific works, articles and books that can be found both in popular and scientific libraries, and in virtual sources. If you conduct research on the Internet, the main thing is not to stop at the first official source (and it will always be the first one!), Because if you want to find information that contradicts the official opinion, then this is the last place you need to look for it.
There are several sites where all the latest scientific articles on natural remedies and alternative methods of cancer treatment are laid out. Here are two English-language sites:
www.greenmedinfo.com and www.naturalnews.com.
Very often even Big Pharma pays for such research for its needs, but the results do not become public. So, for example, it was found that the spice Turmeric (turmeric) and Graviola (a fruit from Latin America) is thousands of times more effective on tumor cells than chemotherapy, and without complications and very selectively. However, you hardly heard about this, as Big Farm failed to synthesize the active components of these plants in order to patent the drug and do business on it, and therefore these studies were simply "buried."
There are many cases when authorities destroyed records of various researchers and medical history of doctors who used successful alternative methods and cured thousands of patients. So Harry Huxley in his clinics cured tens of thousands of people with the help of medicinal herbs, but after winning the trial with the FDA, the police seized and destroyed all the medical records. The same thing happened with the records led by Renee Casey, who treated patients with cancer with Isaac-tea, as well as with records by Raymond Rife, who had an 100% success using the frequency device he invented (the authorities also destroyed these unique devices). The American physician and scientist Stanisław Brzzyński has been winning countless lawsuits from the Texas authorities and the US federal authorities for more than 30 years, aimed at ending his practice of treating cancer with antineoplastons. In this successful struggle, a great role is played by the medical history, which he carefully leads, detailing the process of treatment and the dynamics of all changes in the patients' condition.
As I mentioned earlier, official medicine does not want you to see this evidence. But if you take a little time and show patience, then you will open an ocean of information in which small islets of pseudoscientific official versions and facts will simply be drowned.
Another problem is that many simply do not notice the information they are asking about. For example, in forums you can often meet people who have been cured of cancer by folk or other natural alternative methods that share their experiences. Nevertheless, on their comments, many simply do not react or take them seriously. Often such people are scolded and asked not to fool the head with stupidities. People expect that some miracle cure for cancer will be found, and certainly from medical luminaries. If someone is cured of a diet, decoction of chaga, hemlock, famine or other methods or their combinations, this often does not cause interest. It would seem that it can be more valuable than the experience of a person cured of cancer ?! And, as a rule, among such people, there are patients with 4 stage of cancer, from which the medicine refused, or patients who have passed all kinds of official cancer treatment and only then turned to alternatives.
Thus, if a person really wants to see evidence of the effectiveness of alternative therapies, then he should not seek confirmation of his original point of view (on the correctness of the choice of traditional treatment) in official sources. On the contrary, he should get acquainted with information from other sources, and then compare it with the official one. And as a result of this comparison, the official version will look very unconvincing.
Question 10
What is the success rate of alternative cancer treatments? How does the previous traditional treatment affect it?
Response
Success statistics vary from 80% to 100%. So Linus Pauling, for example, had 80% success from his method of treating hyperdoses of vitamin C. Joanne Brandt (Grape Diet) and Raymond Reif (an apparatus that destroys pathogens within a cancer cell by selecting the right frequency) had an 100% success rate. Dr. Kelly (enzymes, diet, detoxification), Max Gerson (Gerson protocol - intensive shokoterapiya, detoxication), Joana Budwig (Budvig protocol - curd-oil diet, detoxification) and many others - healed over 90%. True, these figures refer to patients (usually in the 3-4 stage of cancer) who were only diagnosed, but did not undergo traditional chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or surgery. Traditional treatment significantly reduces the likelihood of success of alternative treatment. Many experts agree that if a patient resorts to natural alternative methods after official treatment, his chances of recovery may be within 10-50%. The reason is that the immunity of the patient, initially unable to cope and allowing the disease, receives such a blow from chemotherapy, which often can not be restored. The gastrointestinal tract comes in such a deplorable state that the normal absorption of nutrients in it is no longer possible. But this is the main way of delivery of drugs used in most alternative methods! Other body systems also suffer: liver, kidneys, hematopoiesis. Chemotherapy causes a strong acidosis of tissues. All this leads to the fact that the body does not have any physiological reserves, on which the process of recovery could rely.
Unfortunately, 98% of patients who turned to alternative methods were officially treated.
I often met in the forums the opinion that you must first be treated by doctors, and only then you can use "herbs" and diets to maintain. Perhaps, they will fit for maintenance, but it will help only until the next relapse, which after every cycle of official treatment will be more aggressive. The need for the correct choice of treatment is important at the beginning, immediately after the diagnosis. In this case, when choosing an alternative treatment concept, the patient can succeed up to 100% at 1 stage and up to 90% at 3-4.
Question 11
Is it not better to consult a doctor about the use of alternative methods?
Response
If you have chosen the traditional concept of treatment and continue to be treated, then the doctor must be informed. If this is an informed specialist who is really interested in the success of the treatment, then he can positively or neutrally treat that alternative methods or preparations will be added to his treatment. Such a doctor can help avoid complications in combining treatment. For example, cancer patients are often prescribed a blood-thinning agent, and some alternative drugs also have this effect and may increase the likelihood of bleeding. Some drugs (turmeric, ginger, vitamin C, etc.) have the property to enhance the effect of chemotherapy. If your oncologist with this sign, he can reduce the dose of chemotherapy, thereby reducing its toxicity and increasing efficacy. Unfortunately, such doctors are infrequent. Much more often your doctor scolds you and forbids you to use any alternatives. In such a situation, it is difficult to obtain an informed, objective opinion, and therefore responsibility for the decision of the patient should be assumed.
And, of course, there is absolutely no point in asking a doctor opinion about the benefits or harm of choosing an alternative treatment instead of the traditional one. In 99,9% of cases the answer will be unambiguous! It's like asking a drug dealer what you should do: buy a drug from him or instead go and drink carrot juice. Obviously, you will be offered a drug.
Question 12
If chemotherapy is so toxic and harmful, as you say, so what, do not get treated at all? After all, there is no other choice!
Response
The person always has a choice. Even when he does not choose anything - this is also a choice! Very often, when people ask such a question, they often heard, if not about alternative, then, at least, about popular methods. Unfortunately, most do not consider them strong enough to be an alternative, say, chemotherapy. In this case, the comparison is made only on the grounds that chemotherapy is very potent and toxic and that only such a remedy can have a chance in curing a serious illness.
In one of the past questions, I touched on this error. Far from always (and certainly not in the case of chemotherapy), the effectiveness of the drug is equivalent to the degree of its danger and toxicity. That is why many patients do not seriously consider abandoning the severe, crippling traditional treatment in favor of harmless, non-toxic natural remedies, suggesting that they are not strong enough.
But what interesting information can be found in some medical official sources that did not receive proper feedback in the media. This information gives an ambiguous answer to the question posed here:
«My studies have proved conclusively that untreated cancer patients live 4 times longer than those who have been treated. If a cancer patient decides not to do anything at all, he will live longer and feel better than if he undergoes treatment by radiation, chemotherapy or surgery ...»[3]
[3] Professor Jones, 1956, works of the NY Academy of Medical Sciences, vol. 6.
In 1975, the famous British medical journal Lancet published the results of a study comparing the effect on a cancer patient: 1) from a single cycle of chemotherapy; 2) from many cycles of chemotherapy; 3) from total absence of treatment.
Absence of treatment showed significantly better results in patient's life expectancy and quality of life of the remaining period of life.
If patients knew this information, what do you think, would be their answer to the question posed?
Question 13
Where can I find information about clinics using alternative cancer therapies? Where can I find specialists who are treated with alternative methods?
Response
There are several dozen clinics using non-traditional methods of cancer treatment. Their list you will find below. On average, the treatment course in them will vary from $ 10,000 to 25,000 for the course of treatment (1-4 weeks). It is likely that you will need the help of a specialist who will be able to negotiate with the clinic and arrange an escort that will help with the transfer and household device for the duration of the course. For these services, you will need to add another $ 3,000- $ 6,000. It is necessary to understand that the treatment should begin before coming to the clinic and continue after the completion of the treatment course at the clinic. To do this, you will also need to find a specialist.
I'm not familiar with the companies in Russia and the CIS that offer such a service, but it's quite possible to find specialists in Europe, Israel and America who, being Russian speakers, own the topic and could organize treatment in one of such clinics.
Treatment in the clinic is desirable, but not necessary. A lot more patients were cured at home with the help of specialists in natural alternative methods of cancer treatment. Some patients successfully treat themselves, using information obtained in the process of researching this topic. For many, this option may not be appropriate, since the field of information is very extensive and this research process can take from several months to several years. Also, the patient may not have enough knowledge or time to choose the most suitable treatment protocol if his illness has gone far or very aggressive.
The search for individual specialists in Russia and CIS countries has not been systematized yet. However, forums and blogs on cancer topics, especially on the topic of alternative oncology, can give you many interesting contacts with people who are very knowledgeable in the subject and even are specialists in this field. Immediately after the completion of this book, I want to collect information to compile a database of specialists on various methods of natural alternative cancer treatment in Russia, the CIS, and among Russian-speaking immigrants.
For today I already have contacts of several such specialists in Ukraine, Russia and England (including the author) who advise patients, help in the choice of treatment, help to obtain the necessary drugs and devices, and also correct the treatment protocols depending on the patient's condition change.
application
A list of non-traditional cancer treatment clinics and the methods they use
- Camelot Cancer Care [**] (Raided by FDA: Availability Unknown)
MD - DMSO based: Vit. C, 3 botanicals, etc. (Tulsa, Oklahoma)
(Read their FAQ Before Contacting)
- Osage Natural Health [***]
ND - Photon Genius, Ozone, etc. - Weak Patients (Arkansas)
- Integrative Medical Center [***]
MD - Low Dose Naltrexone / ALA - Weak Patients (New Mexico)
- Natural Healing Center [***]
DC - Photon Genius, Hyperbaric, High RF Freq., Etc. (South Carolina)
- Bicher Cancer Institute [***]
MD - Hyperthermia, Radiation, etc. (California)
- Hippocrates Health Institute [***]
Wheatgrass Juice, Juicing, Living Foods (Florida)
- Home For Health [** 1 / 2]
GB-4000 (Amplified), Ozone (multiple methods), PolyMVA, etc. (Kentucky)
- Nevada Center [**]
MD-Ozone, Hydrogen Peroxide, IPT, etc. (Carson City, Nevada)
- Life Works Wellness Center [**]
MD - IPT, Ozone, High Dose Vit. C, Pulsed Magnetic Field, etc. (Clearwater, FL)
- EuroMed Foundation [**]
MD - IPT, Hyperthermia, Ozone Steam, etc. (Phoenix, AZ)
- Gerson Institute [**]
Original Gerson Clinic / Mexico or San Diego, California
- Utopia Wellness [**]
MD - Wide Range of Holistic Protocols (Oldsmar, Florida)
- Nature Works Best [**]
NMD - Cesium Chloride, High Dose Vit C, DMSO, etc. (Tempe, AZ)
- Enlightened Medicine Center [**]
NMD - Photon Genius / Genie, Botanical, IV Therapy (Cottonwood, AZ)
- Riordan Clinic [**]
MD - PolyMVA IV, UVBI, High Dose Vit. C (Wichita, Kansas)
- Linchitz Wellness [**]
MD - Insulin Potentiation Therapy (New York)
- Mexican Clinics
Website With Information on Multiple Clinics in Mexico - Mexico
- Hyperthermia Society
Long List of Hyperthermia Clinics Worldwide (Many in US)
- Medicine of Hope [*]
IPT, DMSO, Ozone IV, H2O2 IV, many other treatments (Mesa, Arizona)
- Dr. Donato Perez Garcia [*]
IPT, clinic of Dr. Donato Perez Garcia (Tijuana, Mexico)
- American Metabolic Inst. [*]
American Metabolic Institute (Tijuana, Mexico)
- Oasis of Hope [*]
MD - Oasis of Hope - Ozone, Laetrile, etc. (Tijuana, Mexico)
- Hallelujah Acres [*]
Retreat for Raw Food / Greens Treatment (North Carolina, USA)
- Cure Foundation [*]
Hoxsey Clinic / Treatment (Mexico)
- Reindeer Integrative
Homeopathy and other approaches (Reno, Nevada)
- An Oasis of Healing
MD - An Oasis of Healing - IPT, Simoncini, etc. (Mesa, Arizona)
- Hope 4 Cancer
Electromedicine, Alkaline Therapy, many other treatments (Tijuana)
- Hawaii Gerson Therapy
Gerson Therapy and other treatments - Hawaii
- Roy Hansen, DC
American doctor: ionized baths, ozone IV, herbs, diet (Mexico)
- Dr. Rowen and Dr. Su
Two MDs that will work with you. They offer treatments (Santa Rosa, California)
- Paul Stallone, NMD
Arizona Integrative Medical Ctr, ozone IV, DMSO / H2O2, etc. (Scottsdale, AZ)
- ITL Cancer Clinic
Immuno-Augmentive Therapy (Cancer Vaccines), etc. (Bahamas)
- Immune Recovery Clinic
Restoration of the immune function (Atlanta, Georgia, USA)
- Immune Recovery and Wellness
Immune building and other treatments (Tucson, Arizona, USA)
- Rudolf Steiner Health Center
Community Supported Anthroposophical Medicine (CSAM) (Michigan, USA)
- Amazon Clinic
Magnetic Meridian Cupping and Many Other Protocols (Amazon - Peru)
- Robert B. Wickman, DO, ND
Nervous system, spine, plus cancer: Email: Rbw66_2000 (Yahoo email) - Ecuador
- Hope Clinic
Wide range of treatments - Australia
- Natural Therapy Center
Natural Therapy Center (NTC) - Cyprus
- Humlegaarden
Well known, alternative therapies and chemotherapy, when needed - Denmark
- Nihaw Akupunktur Klinik
Traditional Chinese Medicine, GB-4000 MOPA - Denmark
- Life Clinic
Experts in the Kelley Protocol - Hong Kong
- Kaqun (Oxygen) Therapy - Hungary Kaqun Clinic
Shao Ling (China) oxygen therapy, both bath and drinks - Hungary
- Mr. PA Deshpande
India practitioner - Various wheat grass, aloe vera, etc. - India
- Sibia Medical Center
Cytotron - Rotational Field Quantum Magnetic Resonance - India
- The Cure Planet [*]
Wide Variety of Western and Eastern Treatments - India
- Dr. Herzog's Special Hospital [**]
Hyperthermia Hospital in Bad Salzhausen - Germany
- Hyperthermia, IPT, Galvanotherapy, etc. [**]
Hyperthermia Hospital in Hannover - Germany
- Dr. Chris Teo
Various Herbal and Other Treatments - Malaysia
- Ozone RHP Clinic
Ozone RHP Clinic - Contact via linked website - Malaysia
- Healing Institute Of Asia
Vitamin C IV Primarily - Philippines
- Institute Santa Monica
Wide range of treatments - Poland - in Polish
- NutriTherapy
NutriTherapy Clinic - Excellent Treatments - South Africa
- Boa Bab Cancer Retreat
Cellect-Budwig, Photon Genius, Nutritional, etc. - South Africa
- Budwig Center
Budwig Protocol and other approaches - Spain
- Medicana International [*]
IPT, DMSO, Hyperthermia, IV Vitamin C, etc. - Turkey
- Osmanoglu Hastanesi [*]
IPT, DMSO, Hyperthermia, IV Vitamin C, etc. - Turkey
List of used literature and other sources of information
- Colin T Campbell «China Study»
- Colin T Campbell «Whole»
- Andrias Moritz «Cancer is not a disease»
- Ty Bollinger «Cancer. Step outside the box »
- Robert G. Wright «Killing Cancer - not People»
- Raymond Francis "Never fear Cancer again"
- Lothar Hirneise "Chemotherapy heals cancer and the world is flat"
- Dr Robert O. Young and Shelley Redford Young «PH miracle»
- Bruce Lipton "Smart cells. Biology of Beliefs »
- Bruce Lipton «The wisdom of your cells»
- Bill Henderson «Cancer-Free»
- Ben Condacre «Bad Pharma»
- Ralph Moss «Cancer industry»
- Barbara Wren «Cellular awakening»
- Sayer Ji, Ben Lerner «The Cancer Killers»
- Marc Sircus «The changing landscape of cancer»
- Marc Sircus «Medical Marijuana»
- Michael Vrentas «Cellect Budwig Protocol»
Download the e-book for free
Download the book for free in DOC format
in English in English German in French in italian in Polish
Download the book for free in PDF format
in English in English German in French in italian in Polish